The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.
Locking is a type of synchronization behavior that ensures that multiple independently-operating processes or threads do not interfere with each other when accessing the same resource. All processes/threads are expected to follow the same steps for locking. If these steps are not followed precisely - or if no locking is done at all - then another process/thread could modify the shared resource in a way that is not visible or predictable to the original process. This can lead to data or memory corruption, denial of service, etc.
Threat Mapped score: 1.9
Industry: Finiancial
Threat priority: P3 - Important (Medium)
CVE: CVE-2021-1782 — KEV
Chain: improper locking (CWE-667) leads to race condition (CWE-362), as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
CVE: CVE-2009-0935
Attacker provides invalid address to a memory-reading function, causing a mutex to be unlocked twice
CVE: CVE-2010-4210
function in OS kernel unlocks a mutex that was not previously locked, causing a panic or overwrite of arbitrary memory.
CVE: CVE-2008-4302
Chain: OS kernel does not properly handle a failure of a function call (CWE-755), leading to an unlock of a resource that was not locked (CWE-832), with resultant crash.
CVE: CVE-2009-1243
OS kernel performs an unlock in some incorrect circumstances, leading to panic.
CVE: CVE-2009-2857
OS deadlock
CVE: CVE-2009-1961
OS deadlock involving 3 separate functions
CVE: CVE-2009-2699
deadlock in library
CVE: CVE-2009-4272
deadlock triggered by packets that force collisions in a routing table
CVE: CVE-2002-1850
read/write deadlock between web server and script
CVE: CVE-2004-0174
web server deadlock involving multiple listening connections
CVE: CVE-2009-1388
multiple simultaneous calls to the same function trigger deadlock.
CVE: CVE-2006-5158
chain: other weakness leads to NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) or deadlock (CWE-833).
CVE: CVE-2006-4342
deadlock when an operation is performed on a resource while it is being removed.
CVE: CVE-2006-2374
Deadlock in device driver triggered by using file handle of a related device.
CVE: CVE-2006-2275
Deadlock when large number of small messages cannot be processed quickly enough.
CVE: CVE-2005-3847
OS kernel has deadlock triggered by a signal during a core dump.
CVE: CVE-2005-3106
Race condition leads to deadlock.
CVE: CVE-2005-2456
Chain: array index error (CWE-129) leads to deadlock (CWE-833)
CVE: CVE-2001-0682
Program can not execute when attacker obtains a mutex.
CVE: CVE-2002-1914
Program can not execute when attacker obtains a lock on a critical output file.
CVE: CVE-2002-1915
Program can not execute when attacker obtains a lock on a critical output file.
CVE: CVE-2002-0051
Critical file can be opened with exclusive read access by user, preventing application of security policy. Possibly related to improper permissions, large-window race condition.
CVE: CVE-2000-0338
Chain: predictable file names used for locking, allowing attacker to create the lock beforehand. Resultant from permissions and randomness.
CVE: CVE-2000-1198
Chain: Lock files with predictable names. Resultant from randomness.
CVE: CVE-2002-1869
Product does not check if it can write to a log file, allowing attackers to avoid logging by accessing the file using an exclusive lock. Overlaps unchecked error condition. This is not quite CWE-412, but close.
Phase | Note |
---|---|
Architecture and Design | N/A |
Implementation | N/A |
Intro: In the following Java snippet, methods are defined to get and set a long field in an instance of a class that is shared across multiple threads. Because operations on double and long are nonatomic in Java, concurrent access may cause unexpected behavior. Thus, all operations on long and double fields should be synchronized.
private long someLongValue; public long getLongValue() { return someLongValue; } public void setLongValue(long l) { someLongValue = l; }
Intro: This code tries to obtain a lock for a file, then writes to it.
Body: PHP by default will wait indefinitely until a file lock is released. If an attacker is able to obtain the file lock, this code will pause execution, possibly leading to denial of service for other users. Note that in this case, if an attacker can perform an flock() on the file, they may already have privileges to destroy the log file. However, this still impacts the execution of other programs that depend on flock().
function writeToLog($message){ $logfile = fopen("logFile.log", "a"); //attempt to get logfile lock if (flock($logfile, LOCK_EX)) { fwrite($logfile,$message); // unlock logfile flock($logfile, LOCK_UN); } else { print "Could not obtain lock on logFile.log, message not recorded\n"; } } fclose($logFile);
Intro: The following function attempts to acquire a lock in order to perform operations on a shared resource.
Body: However, the code does not check the value returned by pthread_mutex_lock() for errors. If pthread_mutex_lock() cannot acquire the mutex for any reason, the function may introduce a race condition into the program and result in undefined behavior.
void f(pthread_mutex_t *mutex) { pthread_mutex_lock(mutex); /* access shared resource */ pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex); }
Intro: It may seem that the following bit of code achieves thread safety while avoiding unnecessary synchronization...
Body: The programmer wants to guarantee that only one Helper() object is ever allocated, but does not want to pay the cost of synchronization every time this code is called.
if (helper == null) { synchronized (this) { if (helper == null) { helper = new Helper(); } } } return helper;