CWE-242: Use of Inherently Dangerous Function

Export to Word

Description

The product calls a function that can never be guaranteed to work safely.

Extended Description

Certain functions behave in dangerous ways regardless of how they are used. Functions in this category were often implemented without taking security concerns into account. The gets() function is unsafe because it does not perform bounds checking on the size of its input. An attacker can easily send arbitrarily-sized input to gets() and overflow the destination buffer. Similarly, the >> operator is unsafe to use when reading into a statically-allocated character array because it does not perform bounds checking on the size of its input. An attacker can easily send arbitrarily-sized input to the >> operator and overflow the destination buffer.


ThreatScore

Threat Mapped score: 0.0

Industry: Finiancial

Threat priority: Unclassified


Observed Examples (CVEs)

Related Attack Patterns (CAPEC)

N/A


Attack TTPs

N/A

Modes of Introduction

Phase Note
Implementation N/A

Common Consequences

Potential Mitigations

Applicable Platforms


Demonstrative Examples

Intro: The code below calls gets() to read information into a buffer.

Body: The gets() function in C is inherently unsafe.

char buf[BUFSIZE]; gets(buf);

Intro: The code below calls the gets() function to read in data from the command line.

Body: However, gets() is inherently unsafe, because it copies all input from STDIN to the buffer without checking size. This allows the user to provide a string that is larger than the buffer size, resulting in an overflow condition.

char buf[24]; printf("Please enter your name and press <Enter>\n"); gets(buf); ... }

Notes

← Back to CWE list